United States v. Jennifer Vanegas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 29, 202423-50046California859 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-50046

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00616-SVW-2 JENNIFER ANN VANEGAS, AKA Mayra Ann Arce, AKA Valerie Flores,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 11, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BATTAGLIA,*** District Judge.

Jennifer Vanegas appeals her conviction after a jury trial. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Anthony J. Battaglia, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. Vanegas contends that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.