United States v. Antonio Barrera-Mackorty

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 29, 202423-50031California810 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-50031

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00404-DMG-1 v.

ANTONIO ULISES BARRERA- MEMORANDUM*

MACKORTY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 12, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and ANELLO,** District Judge.

Antonio Ulises Barrera-Mackorty (“Barrera-MacKorty”) appeals his

conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1425(a) for procuring naturalization by means

contrary to law. We review a challenge that a statute is unconstitutionally vague

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Michael M. Anello, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. de novo, United States v. Mincoff, 574 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.