Ralph Duran v. Cal. Dep't of Forestry & Fire Protection
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RALPH DURAN; MICHAEL ESPARZA, No. 23-16155
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-06120-CRB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted July 10, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Ralph Duran and Michael Esparza (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the dismissal of their
lawsuit challenging the COVID-19 testing policy adopted by the California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (“CAL FIRE”) during the height of the
COVID-19 pandemic. We affirm the dismissal because Plaintiffs lack standing.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Plaintiffs “must demonstrate standing separately for each form of relief
sought.” Friends of…