Bailey

Bailey v. S.F. Dist. Attorney's Office

Good Law
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2024S265223California10,562 words

Opinion

Opinion

Evans, J.

Opinion of the Court by Evans, J.

Plaintiff Twanda Bailey sued the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office, former District Attorney George Gascon, and the City and County of San Francisco (collectively, the City) for violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Government Code section 12900 et seq.1 Under FEHA, it is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to harass an employee because of their race. (§ 12940, subd. (j)(1).) It is also an unlawful employment practice for an employer to retaliate against an employee for engaging in protected activity, such as making a complaint of racial harassment in the workplace. (§ 12940, subd. (h).) Bailey, who is African-American, alleges that a coworker with whom she shared an office and job duties called her the N- word. Bailey further alleges that, after she reported this incident, the human resources manager for the District Attorney’s Office obstructed the filing of a formal complaint, engaged in a course of intimidating conduct, and ultimately threatened Bailey that she was “going to get it.” Bailey’s action against the City alleges she was subjected to racial harassment by her coworker and retaliation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.