Shin

Shin v. Office of the State Long-term Care Ombudsman CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2024B330937California3,349 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weingart, J.

Filed 7/29/24 Shin v. Office of the State Long-term Care Ombudsman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

HAI-JIN SHIN, B330937

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCV19313) v.

OFFICE OF THE STATE LONG-

TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Douglas W. Stern, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Hai-Jin H. Shin and Hai-Jin Helena Shin for Plaintiff and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Jodi L. Cleesattle, Assistant Attorney General, Catherine A. Woodbridge and Kyle Da Silva, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents. ______________________ In June 2020, in the midst…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.