Victor Davenport v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 202423-35146California904 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR DAVENPORT, No. 23-35146

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00289-MKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Mary K. Dimke, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 7, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER, RAWLINSON, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Claimant Victor Davenport appeals from the district court’s decision

affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for

disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review the district court’s order de novo and reverse only if the Administrative

Law Judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.