Christopher Nettleton v. Exact Sciences Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 202423-35399California966 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 30 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTOPHER NETTLETON, No. 23-35399
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:22-cv-01290-MC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 3, 2024* Portland, Oregon
Before: RAWLINSON, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Christopher Nettleton appeals from the dismissal of his breach of
contract and fraud claims arising out of his employment with Defendant Exact
Sciences Corporation. We review de novo the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim. Whitaker v. Tesla Motors,
Inc., 985 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir. 2021). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. § 1291, and we affirm the dismissal of Nettleton’s contract…