Heather Stein v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 202423-16115California964 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HEATHER LYNN STEIN, No. 23-16115

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00141-JJT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 9, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Heather Lynn Stein appeals the district court’s order

affirming a decision by an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denying Stein

disability benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

COA

district court’s order affirming the ALJ’s denial of benefits de novo, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.