King

King v. Lalanne CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2024C096707California4,434 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 07/30/24 King v. Lalanne CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

MARK E. KING, C096707

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCV0044158)

v.

CORINNE LALANNE,

Defendant and Appellant.

This appeal concerns a partition action brought by plaintiff Mark E. King against his former romantic partner, defendant Corinne Lalanne. King requested partition of real property by sale and sought to prove he and Lalanne owned the property equally as joint tenants. Lalanne did not object to partition but maintained that the deeds to the property gave King only a 25 percent interest. Following a bench trial, the trial court agreed with King and entered an interlocutory judgment ordering partition of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.