City of Irvine v. Kingston Kohr, LLC CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2024G061805California8,410 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gooding, J.

Filed 7/30/24 City of Irvine v. Kingston Kohr, LLC CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CITY OF IRVINE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G061805, G061821, G061858

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2022- 01261652)

KINGSTON KOHR, LLC,

OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Consolidated appeal from orders of the Superior Court of Orange County, Sandy N. Leal, Judge. Affirmed. Appellant’s motion to augment the record. Granted. Carney Mehr and Kendra Carney Mehr for Defendant and Appellant. Rutan & Tucker and Noam Duzman for Plaintiff and Respondent. This consolidated appeal stems from a nuisance abatement action initiated by the City of Irvine (the City) after a fire destroyed the roof of a 26,000 square…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.