Eric Volk v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 202422-16192California797 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC VOLK, No. 22-16192

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00738-DJA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Daniel J. Albregts, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 2, 2024**

Before: D. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Eric Volk appeals pro se the district court’s order affirming the

administrative law judge’s (ALJ) decision denying his application for disability

insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We “review the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.