Fernando Infanzon v. Allstate Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 202422-56070California1,393 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO INFANZON, No. 22-56070

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-06483-JAK-SK SUZANNE E. RAND-LEWIS, Attorney for plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM*

Appellant,

v.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY;

ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY

COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

LETICIA POMES; POMES INSURANCE

SERVICES, INC.; DOES, 1 through 10,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 19, 2024 Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Fernando Infanzon appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company

(“Allstate”) on his state law claim against Allstate for breach of the implied

covenant of good faith and fair…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.