Rose

Rose v. SAS Retail Services CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2024G063200California2,385 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 8/2/24 Rose v. SAS Retail Services CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

COURTNEY ROSE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G063200

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2022- 01292199)

SAS RETAIL SERVICES, LLC,

OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Peter J. Wilson, Judge. Affirmed. Littler Mendelson, Fermin H. Llaguno, Nolan McCready and Kimberly M. Shappley for Defendant and Appellant. Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik De Blouw, Norman B. Blumenthal and Kyle R. Nordrehaug for Plaintiff and Respondent. Plaintiff Courtney Rose filed a lawsuit under the Labor Code 1 Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) (Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.) against her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.