People v. Cross CA4/3

DISCUSSION

In his supplemental briefs, Cross does not address the issue in this appeal—whether the court erred in denying his most recent section 851.91 petition to seal his arrest and related records.4 Instead, he makes several arguments concerning the validity of his underlying 2011 conviction

3 Proceedings are ongoing in the Orange County Superior Court regarding the correction of the abstract of judgment.

4 Section 851.91 “provides for the sealing of arrest records in certain situations when the arrest did not result in a conviction.” (People v. D.C. (2020) 54 Cal.App.5th 727, 733.)

3 5 and sentence. Cross may not use this appeal to attack the underlying judgment, which was upheld on appeal and has been final since 2013. His claims concerning his underlying conviction and sentence are beyond the 6 scope of this appeal. Cross’s supplemental briefs do not identify any grounds for reversing the court’s postjudgment order denying his latest motion to seal his arrest and related records. We have also examined the record and are satisfied Cross’s counsel fully complied with the responsibilities of appellate counsel and no arguable issues exist. Accordingly, to the extent Cross…