Diaz-Magana

Diaz-Magana v. Diaz CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2024F087153California6,457 words

Opinion

Opinion

Santos, J.

Filed 8/2/24 Diaz-Magana v. Diaz CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

LUZ E. DIAZ-MAGANA,

F087153

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. VCU286266) v.

EDUARDO DIAZ, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Bret D. Hillman, Judge. Michael B. Brown for Defendant and Appellant. Hornburg, Gaebe & Hannah, Inc., C. Matthew Gaebe and William Hannah for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- Luz E. Diaz-Magana brought an action to partition property that her parents, Jose Maldonado Diaz and Maria Mendez Diaz, deeded to her and her two brothers, Eduardo Diaz, who is also known as Edward Diaz, and Roberto Diaz, as joint tenants.1 Only Edward appeared in the action, but he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.