Martinez Solis v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 202423-2379California1,247 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUGO JOSE MARTINEZ No. 23-2379 SOLIS; H.Y.M.L.; DIANA RUBI LOPEZ Agency Nos.

RECINOS; S.J.M.L, A220-306-391

A220-306-384

Petitioners,

A220-306-392

A220-306-385

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted July 10, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Hugo Jose Martinez Solis (Hugo); his wife, Diana Rubi Lopez

Recinos (Diana); and their two children, all citizens of Guatemala, seek review of a

decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the Immigration

Judge’s (IJ) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).1 We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.