People v. Curry CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Delgadillo brief and asks the court to independently review the record for error in the same way we would do if this case was controlled by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. To assist the court in its review of the record, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel has identified a possible issue that was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Whether the court erred in finding Curry was ineligible for relief as a matter of law. We have independently reviewed the record for this appeal. We have not discovered any potentially meritorious issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Curry on this appeal.

3

DISPOSITION

The order denying Curry’s petition for resentencing under section 1172.6 is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

O’ROURKE, J.

KELETY, J.

4