Darras

MACH-1 RSMH, LLC v. Darras

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 5, 2024G062330California8,055 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/5/

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION *

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MACH-1 RSMH, LLC,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G062330

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020- 01141980) FRANK DARRAS et al.,

OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Nathan R. Scott, Judge. Affirmed. Larson, Paul A. Rigali, Tyler J. Franklin and Benjamin Falstein for Plaintiff and Appellant. Greenberg Gross, Alan A. Greenberg and Claire-Lise Y. Kutlay for Defendants and Respondents Frank Darras and Anthony Ciabattoni.

* Only the untitled introductory paragraphs, the Facts, the first

paragraph and Part I.A. of the Discussion, and the Disposition are certified for publication. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.1105 & 8.1110.) Law Office of Frank W. Battaile and Frank W. Battaile for Defendants and Respondents Marc Joseph Spizzirri and 1700 North El Camino Real, LLC. * * * California’s version of the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (Civ. Code, § 3439 et seq.; UVTA) governs claims for voidable or fraudulent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.