Bethany Farber v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 202423-55541California965 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUG 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

BETHANY FARBER, No. 23-55541

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01173-ODW-KS v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal MEMORANDUM* entity; DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

A Texas grand jury mistakenly indicted Plaintiff-Appellant Bethany Kaley

Farber for an act of vandalism committed by Bethany Gill Farber. A Texas court

issued a no-bail warrant for Bethany Kaley Farber’s arrest. The warrant and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). associated criminal database information identified Bethany Kaley Farber by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.