Mark Brown v. Peter Basznianyn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 8, 202423-15619California631 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

AUG 8 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK DAVID BROWN, No. 23-15619

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00050-DCB v.

PETER BASZNIANYN; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 8, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Mark David Brown appeals pro se from the district

court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of, and entering final judgment

for, Defendants-Appellees in his action alleging excessive force during his pretrial

detention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s resolution of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.