Hasmik Chinaryan v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
113 F.4th 888
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 202421-56237California12,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

NGUYEN, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HASMIK JASMINE CHINARYAN, Nos. 21-56237 Individually and as Guardian as Litem 22-55168 for NEC, a Minor; MARIANA MANUKYAN, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-09302- Plaintiffs-Appellants, MCS-E

v.

OPINION

CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS

ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT;

MICHEL MOORE, Chief of Police; ROMERO GONZALEZ, Officer; FRED CUETO, Sergeant; RODRIGO SORIA, Officer; AIRAM POTTER, Officer; BRITTANY OKE, Officer; JEFF RODD, Officer; DANIEL MARTINEZ, Officer; DANIEL GAYTON, Officer; EDUARDO PICHE, Officer; MARIO MENSES, Officer; BRITTANY PRIMO, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Mark C. Scarsi, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted July 21, 2023 Pasadena, California

Filed August 14, 2024

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Danielle J. Forrest, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Nguyen; Partial Dissent by Judge Forrest

SUMMARY *

Fourth Amendment / High-Risk Vehicle Stop

The panel affirmed the district court’s judgment following a jury trial in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.