Chamberlin

United States v. Chamberlin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 202423-969California774 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 14 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-969 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00036-MWF-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

RICHARD ROYDEN CHAMBERLIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 11, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Richard Royden Chamberlin appeals the district court’s sentence of

months’ imprisonment in connection with his shooting at a Planned Parenthood

clinic. Chamberlin pleaded guilty to one count of forcible interference and

attempted forcible interference with the obtaining and provision of reproductive

health services, in violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Act, 18 U.S.C. § 248(a)(1), and one count of being a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.