Election Integrity Project California, Inc. v. Shirley Weber

Good Law
113 F.4th 1072
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 202423-55726California15,528 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wardlaw, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT No. 23-55726

CALIFORNIA, INC.; JAMES P.

BRADLEY; MARK REED; BUZZ D.C. No. PATTERSON; MIKE CARGILE; 2:21-cv-00032-

RONDA KENNEDY, AB-MAA

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

OPINION

v.

SHIRLEY WEBER, California Secretary of State; ROB BONTA, California Attorney General;

SHANNON BUSHEY; FRANCISCO

DIAZ; TIM DUPUIS; KRISTIN

CONNELLY; JAMES A. KUS;

DEAN C. LOGAN; GINA

MARTINEZ; BOB PAGE;

REBECCA SPENCER; HANG

NGUYEN; MICHAEL JIMENEZ;

TRICIA WEBBER; MICHELLE

ASCENCION; ELIANA CANO;

AIME ESPINOZA,

Defendants-Appellees. ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CA, INC. V. WEBER

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 5, 2024 Pasadena, California

Filed August 15, 2024

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Michelle T. Friedland, and Jennifer Sung, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wardlaw

SUMMARY *

Elections

The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of a lawsuit brought by Election…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.