Patrick Neiss v. Pete Bludworth
114 F.4th 1038
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 202422-35877California4,829 words
Opinion
Opinion
Wardlaw, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK O. NEISS, No. 22-35877
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:21-cv-00103-
SPW-KLD
PETE BLUDWORTH, Warden;
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
STATE OF MONTANA, OPINION
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 28, 2024 Seattle, Washington
Filed August 16, 2024
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Barrington D. Parker, Jr., * and Eric D. Miller, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Wardlaw
* The Honorable Barrington D. Parker, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **
Habeas Corpus
The panel reversed the district court’s dismissal of Patrick Neiss’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition under the preliminary screening provision of Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and remanded for further proceedings. Neiss was…