Nancy Hearden v. Shlomo Rechnitz
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 16 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NANCY HEARDEN; et al., No. 23-15195 23-15452 Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. v. 2:22-cv-00994-MCE-DMC
SHLOMO RECHNITZ; et al.,
MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 13, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: GRABER, CALLAHAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Defendants1 appeal the district court’s order remanding this case to state
court. The district court ruled that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Defendants consist of Brius Management Co. (now known as Pacific Healthcare Holdings); Brius, LLC (now known as Los…