Nancy Hearden v. Shlomo Rechnitz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 202423-15195California728 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NANCY HEARDEN; et al., No. 23-15195 23-15452 Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. v. 2:22-cv-00994-MCE-DMC

SHLOMO RECHNITZ; et al.,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 13, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER, CALLAHAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Defendants1 appeal the district court’s order remanding this case to state

court. The district court ruled that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Defendants consist of Brius Management Co. (now known as Pacific Healthcare Holdings); Brius, LLC (now known as Los…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.