Eric Hurst v. Estela Derr
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 16 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERIC HURST, No. 23-15523
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-171-DKW-RT v.
ESTELA DERR, et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Derrick K. Watson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 14, 2024** Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: PAEZ, M. SMITH, and KOH, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge M. SMITH.
Eric Hurst (“Hurst”) appeals the dismissal of his Bivens1 claim against Earl
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), established that a violation of a citizen’s constitutional rights by a federal officer can give rise to a federal cause of action for damages. Dayton, a…