Aguilar-Liscano

Aguilar-Liscano v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 202423-1462California824 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISELA AGUILAR-LISCANO, No. 23-1462 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-464-337 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 14, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER, CALLAHAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Isela Aguilar-Liscano, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Where,

as here, the BIA adopts the IJ’s reasoning, we review both decisions. Garcia-

Martinez v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.