Faysal Jama v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
113 F.4th 924
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 202422-35449California9,729 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FAYSAL A. JAMA, on behalf of No. 22-35449 himself and all other similarly situated; JAMES KELLEY; ANYSA D.C. Nos. NGETHPHARAT, 2:20-cv-00454-
MJP
Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:20-cv-00652-
MJP
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL OPINION
AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY; STATE FARM FIRE
AND CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 13, 2023 Portland, Oregon
Filed August 19, 2024 Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Jennifer Sung, Circuit Judges, and Jed S. Rakoff, * District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Rakoff; Dissent by Judge Rawlinson
SUMMARY **
Washington Insurance Law
In a putative class action brought under Washington law by drivers who alleged that their insurers failed to pay them the actual cash value of their cars after their cars were totaled in accidents, the panel (1) reversed the district court’s order decertifying the negotiation class, (2) affirmed the order decertifying the…