Walter Ayala-Recarte v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 202419-70645California1,343 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER ALEXANDER AYALA- No. 19-70645

RECARTE, 19-72515

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-402-941

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 15, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BADE and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and CURIEL,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Walter A. Ayala-Recarte, a native and citizen of Honduras, seeks

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. an Immigration Judge’s (IJ)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.