Manney
United States v. Manney
Opinion
Opinion
de Alba, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-716 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cr-00019-
HDM-CSD-
v.
GAIL MANNEY,
OPINION
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 13, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona
Filed August 19, 2024
Before: Roopali H. Desai and Ana de Alba, Circuit Judges, and Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge. *
Opinion by Judge de Alba
* The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **
Criminal Law
The panel affirmed Gail Manney’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), which makes it a crime for any person in connection with the acquisition or attempted acquisition of any firearm knowingly to make any false or fictitious oral or written statement with respect to any fact material to the lawfulness of the sale of such firearm. The panel rejected Manney’s argument that § 922(a)(6), as applied to the facts of her case, violates the…