Cerda

Cerda v. City of Los Angeles CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 16, 2024B322004California3,931 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/16/24 Cerda v. City of Los Angeles CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

LOUIS CERDA, B322004

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC721977) v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Malcolm Mackey, Judge. Affirmed. Cole & Loeterman and Dana M. Cole for Plaintiff and Appellant. Hydee Feldstein Soto, City Attorney, Denise C. Mills, Chief Deputy City Attorney, Scott Marcus, Chief Assistant City Attorney, Shaun Dabby Jacobs and Jonathan H. Eisenman, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiff Louis Cerda appeals following the trial court’s entry of judgment on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.