Rotter

Rotter v. Bauer CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2024B322981California2,268 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 8/19/24 Rotter v. Bauer CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

SAM ROTTER, 2d Civ. No. B322981 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2021- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00553372-CU-MC-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

ALEXANDRA BAUER, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

Sam Rotter filed an action against “Alexandra Bauer, In her Official Capacity as Acting Director of the County of Los Angeles . . . Child Support Services Department,” hereafter “respondent.” Proceeding in propria persona, Rotter appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained respondent’s demurrer without leave to amend. Appellant contends the trial court erroneously concluded that his action is barred because he failed to comply with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.