People v. Sinigur CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2024C091622ACalifornia11,402 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

Filed 8/19/24 P. v. Sinigur CA3 Opinion following transfer from Supreme Court

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C091622

v. (Super. Ct. No. 18FE004949)

VLADIMIR SINIGUR,

ON TRANSFER

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Vladimir Sinigur committed 18 sex offenses against his daughter and two sons. Sixteen of those offenses were committed against the daughter, who was six years old when the abuse came to light. With respect to those crimes, a jury convicted defendant of two counts of sexual intercourse (counts one and three), five counts of oral

1 copulation (counts five, seven, nine, eleven, and thirteen), one count of sexual penetration (count…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.