People v. Wright CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified three possible issues that have been reviewed in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal. 1. Whether Wright properly waived his right to appeal the denial of his motion to exclude the curbside identification from evidence; 2. Whether the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress identification evidence at the preliminary hearing; and

2 3. Whether the trial court erred in denying the motion to dismiss the information under section 995. We have independently reviewed the record for error as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Wright on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

BUCHANAN, J.

KELETY, J.

3