Jane Doe v. Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 202423-55500California689 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Jane Doe, No. 23-55500 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:23-cv-00444-CJC-ADS v.

MEMORANDUM*

Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian,

Defendant - Appellant.

Kelly Davis, No. 23-55649 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:23-cv-00772-CJC-ADS v.

Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 12, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pasadena, California

Before: EBEL, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.***

Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian appeals two district court orders

remanding putative class action complaints—one brought by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.