People v. Caguiat CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2024C100009California3,358 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/20/24 P. v. Caguiat CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100009

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 10F01924)

v.

RICHARD SUBA CAGUIAT,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Richard Suba Caguiat appeals from the trial court’s July 2023 resentencing order. His appointed counsel asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Caguiat filed a supplemental brief raising multiple arguments, including that the trial court abused its discretion during resentencing and erred in failing to recalculate his custody credit. We will remand the matter for the trial court to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.