Constantina Bustos Garcia v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202420-70409California904 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CONSTANTINA BUSTOS GARCIA, No. 20-70409

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-881-531

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 22, 2024**

Before: BYBEE, OWENS, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Constantina Bustos Garcia (“Bustos Garcia”), a native and citizen of

Mexico, appeals from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision

dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her

application for cancellation of removal. As the parties are familiar with the facts,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). we do not recount them here. We deny the petition.

1. Bustos Garcia challenges the BIA’s finding that she was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.