Michael Greenstein v. Noblr Reciprocal Exchange

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 202422-17023California1,936 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL GREENSTEIN; CYNTHIA No. 22-17023 NELSON; SINKWAN AU, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other persons D.C. No. similarly situated, 4:21-cv-04537-JSW

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

Noblr Reciprocal Exchange, a Colorado corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 14, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: MILLER, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Michael Greenstein, Cynthia Nelson, and Sinkwan Au

filed this putative class action against Defendant-Appellee Noblr Reciprocal

Exchange after their driver’s license numbers were targeted in a cyberattack. The

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. attackers, whose identities remain anonymous, conducted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.