Guenther

People v. Guenther

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 22, 2024H049810California20,503 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danner, J.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History In July 2021, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a first amended information (information) charging Guenther with 10 counts each of oral copulation by force, violence, menace, duress, or fear (§ 287, subd. (c)(2)(A); counts 1–10) and sodomy by force, violence, menace, duress, or fear (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)(A); counts 11–20).3 The information named Jane Doe as the alleged victim in all 20 counts, which allegedly occurred between September 6, 2020, and November 18, 2020. The jury trial began in late May 2021. Doe testified over the course of seven days, and Guenther testified in his own defense. The theory of prosecution, reflected in the verdict forms submitted to the jury, was that Guenther had committed the charged crimes by duress. The jury found Guenther guilty of all 20 counts. In February 2022, the trial court denied a motion for a new trial filed by Guenther on grounds including insufficient evidence to establish the theory of duress. The court sentenced Guenther to consecutive mitigated terms of three years as to each of the 10 counts of oral copulation and 10 counts of sodomy, for a total of 60 years in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.