The Estate of Carson Bride v. Yolo Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
112 F.4th 1168
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202423-55134California6,225 words

Opinion

Opinion

Siler, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THE ESTATE OF CARSON BRIDE, No. 23-55134 by and through his appointed administrator KRISTIN BRIDE; A. D.C. No. K., by and through her legal guardian 2:21-cv-06680- Jane Doe 1; A. C., by and through her FWS-MRW legal guardian Jane Doe 2; A. O., by and through her legal guardian Jane Does 3; TYLER CLEMENTI OPINION FOUNDATION, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

YOLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fred W. Slaughter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 11, 2024 Pasadena, California

Filed August 22, 2024 ESTATE OF BRIDE V. YOLO TECH., INC.

Before: Eugene E. Siler, * Carlos T. Bea, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Siler

SUMMARY **

Communications Decency Act

The panel reversed the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ misrepresentation claims and affirmed the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ products liability claims in their diversity class…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.