C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Atrium Medical Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202423-16020California517 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
C.R. BARD, INC., No. 23-16020
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00284-DGC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted July 9, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
In a concurrently filed opinion, we resolve the patent-misuse question
presented by this appeal. In this memorandum disposition, we address the
remaining issues.
1. Because we hold that the parties’ agreement does not constitute patent
misuse, we need not evaluate Bard’s quantum-meruit argument.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 2. Atrium contends that the parties’ agreement terminated in 2019 because it
does not include the Canadian patent, which is owned by Bard Peripheral…