Pich

United States v. Pich

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202423-1619California899 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1619 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:17-cr-02402-LAB-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

RANGSEY ARUNDECH PICH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 13, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: EBEL, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.** Concurrence by Judge FORREST.

Rangsey Arundech Pich appeals the district court’s July 24, 2023 judgment

revoking his supervised release. He contends that the district court lacked

jurisdiction to revoke supervised release. We review de novo the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, sitting by designation. jurisdiction over revocation proceedings regardless of any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.