Pich
United States v. Pich
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1619 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:17-cr-02402-LAB-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
RANGSEY ARUNDECH PICH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 13, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: EBEL, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.** Concurrence by Judge FORREST.
Rangsey Arundech Pich appeals the district court’s July 24, 2023 judgment
revoking his supervised release. He contends that the district court lacked
jurisdiction to revoke supervised release. We review de novo the district court’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, sitting by designation. jurisdiction over revocation proceedings regardless of any…