United States v. Cody Robledo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202422-50234California613 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50234

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:21-cr-02868-AJB-1 v.

CODY EDWARD ROBLEDO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 12, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: EBEL,** BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Cody Robledo appeals the district court’s refusal to apply a minor-

role reduction at sentencing. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. Even if the district court erred in applying the legal standard that

governs the minor-role reduction, see United States v. Dominguez-Caicedo, 40 F.4th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.