Akbar
United States v. Akbar
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-671 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:18-cr-03081-LAB-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
KEENAN IMON AKBAR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 13, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: EBEL, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.***
Defendant-Appellant Keenan Akbar appeals the district court’s revocation of
his supervised release. Akbar claims the district court violated his due process
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, sitting by designation. right to confrontation by admitting his ex-girlfriend’s…