Akbar

United States v. Akbar

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202423-671California628 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-671 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:18-cr-03081-LAB-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

KEENAN IMON AKBAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 13, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: EBEL, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.***

Defendant-Appellant Keenan Akbar appeals the district court’s revocation of

his supervised release. Akbar claims the district court violated his due process

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, sitting by designation. right to confrontation by admitting his ex-girlfriend’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.