Pinto Rivero v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202423-1230California1,129 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 22 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CARLOS PINTO RIVERO; No. 23-1230 JESSICA LUZ PINTO ESCALANTE; Agency Nos.

JOSE ASUNCION SALCIDO CERRILLO, A216-260-462

A216-260-463

Petitioner,

A216-260-464

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 20, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BRESS and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. This case involves three petitioners, Juan Carlos Pinto Rivero (“Pinto

Rivero”), Jessica Luz Pinto Escalante (“Escalante”), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.