Laurie Riccio v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202423-35265California981 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAURIE A. RICCIO, No. 23-35265

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05461-DWC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington David W. Christel, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted August 20, 2024*** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Laurie Riccio appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner

of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, the parties consented to have this matter decided by a Magistrate Judge. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.