Jimenez Rivera v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202423-742California1,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE ERNESTO JIMENEZ No. 23-742 RIVERA; SILVIA SERRANO AYALA, Agency Nos.

A209-063-759

Petitioners, A209-063-760 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 20, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BRESS and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, District Judge.*** Jorge Ernesto Jimenez Rivera (Jimenez) and his wife, Silvia Serrano Ayala

(Serrano), both natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of a Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. Immigration Appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.