United States v. Dean Lafromboise

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202423-35442California808 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35442

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 1:18-cv-00134-BMM 1:94-cr-00082-BMM-5 v.

DEAN LAFROMBOISE, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,*** District Judge.

Dean LaFromboise appeals the district court’s denial of his second or

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We review a denial of a § 2255 motion de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. novo, United States v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.