Maridon

Maridon v. Federal Aviation Administration

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202423-1047California599 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH R. MARIDON Sr., No. 23-1047 FAA No. 2020-0949 Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

FEDERAL AVIATION

ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Aviation Administration

Submitted August 20, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.***

Joseph Maridon petitions for review of an order issued by the Federal

Aviation Administration’s (FAA) chief administrative judge (CAJ) reversing an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. administrative law judge’s (ALJ) order awarding Maridon attorneys’ fees and costs

after the ALJ dismissed the enforcement action the FAA brought…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.