Juan Ocadiz-Mena v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202420-72192California498 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN LUIS OCADIZ-MENA, No. 20-72192 Agency No. Petitioner, A087-958-614 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 21, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: BERZON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision
denying his untimely motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). When the BIA rules on a motion to reopen, “[o]ur review is limited to the