Juan Ocadiz-Mena v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202420-72192California498 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN LUIS OCADIZ-MENA, No. 20-72192 Agency No. Petitioner, A087-958-614 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 21, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BERZON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision

denying his untimely motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). When the BIA rules on a motion to reopen, “[o]ur review is limited to the

BIA’s decision where the BIA conducts its own review of the evidence and law.”

Perez-Portillo v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.